Oct. 31st, 2007

field trip

Oct. 31st, 2007 01:17 am
faceless_wonder: posing with my blue hair, in an NYC subway station. (Default)
today my incarceration class took a field trip to FCI Greenville, a federal prison. i appreciate the effort my professor made to arrange the trip, because knowing what goes on in a prison is crucial to being able to understand the law of incarceration, and the tension between the interests of the prison management and the prisoners. i also understand that a prison tour is probably the closest a common person who does not actually work in a correctional facility will ever get to life on the inside.

still, i really feel like it did more harm than good. first of all, the prison officials were very evasive, as if they were hiding something. i'm not surprised, but was still disappointed. i don't trust law enforcement a whole lot, and corrections officers and wardens are part of that. but, the trip through the prison felt a lot like a public relations event--which, i'm sure, is exactly why they allow people to take tours of federal prisons, to gain goodwill among the citizenry.

the only person who struck me as particularly honest was the prison psychologist. the prison holds about 1500 people. she told us she was the only psychologist on staff for the entire prison, that there was no way you got to see her unless things were serious, and that the people she saw today had been on the waitlist for three months. apparently full staffing is four psychologists. that is still quite disturbing; many prisoners have mental issues that demand treatment, and i doubt even four psychologists are enough to treat several hundred people who need psychological treatment.

but, at least she was clear that she was doing what she could, but her services weren't enough. everyone else i talked to equated all they could do with ideally all that could be done, and i found that to be such a defeatist attitude toward running a prison, an attitude that could be fatal to much-needed prison reforms. they seemed more concerned with making sure we left the prison with a positive impression of the place. i would have left with a far more positive feeling about federal prison if the people running it were a little more ready to admit that they still had a ways to go before the conditions were anywhere near optimal.

the other thing that bothered me profoundly about the prison tour was the fact that we were going right through their living, working, and playing areas. i had been on jail and prison tours before, and seen cellblocks, recreation areas, and work areas. all of those previous trips, i had seen the facilities without any people in them. it was always interesting to see the facilities, but i had wondered what they would be like, if they would be any different, if people had occupied them.

i learned today, and it was unpleasant. i felt so uncomfortable when i was there...like i was a voyeur. i was not allowed to talk to them, and they were not allowed to talk to me, because any question from a person on the outside to someone on the inside would be considered an interview--something that required written consent from the prisoner. this rule was interpreted so rigidly that it included common pleasantries, such as "hi, how are you." all we could do was walk around and look. it started innocently enough; we saw the prisoners stroll across the prison yard from building to building during their ten-minute transfer period that they get every hour. that didn't affect me much at all.

but, we then walked into a cellblock and watched the people who were still in it. we saw people sitting and chatting...we saw people watching television...we saw people walking in and out of their cellblocks...we saw people leading on their lives in the most private area that they get. i felt so out of place as a stranger watching what was going on in the cellblock. it never got any better as we walked to other places: the fitness room, the gymnasium, the classrooms, the library, the religious building. it all felt the same: like i was watching strangers to live their lives when i wasn't invited at all to live them. it was wrong for me to be there.


you lose a lot of rights going to prison, and i understand that...you lose the right to come and go as you please, and the right to interact with the rest of society. that's part of the deterrent, and the hope is that the time away can be used for rehabilitative purposes. but, it's unsettling to think that one of the rights you lose is the right not to have random people traipsing through your living space, while you were there, at the whim of the warden. that goes to basic human decency, and that's a right you shouldn't lose no matter what you may have done.
faceless_wonder: posing with my blue hair, in an NYC subway station. (Default)
i didn't watch the democratic debate last night. but, i was reading a recap...and i've got to hand it to Joe Biden for one of the best political one-liners i've heard in a while. he was discussing Rudy Giuliani, and stated:

"There's only three things he mentions in a sentence: a noun and a verb and 9/11. I mean, there's nothing else."

zing.

in all seriousness, though...i'm really hoping voters in 2008 don't fall for the "vote republican or the terrorists will win" idea, or "vote republican or else you're betraying all the hard work americans have done to pull together and fight terror after 9/11." i was hoping that would be the case in 2004, although there was no such luck there. yes, we have a distinct interest in preventing further terrorist attacks. but, curtailing civil liberties and fighting a war that only increases anti-american sentiment and risks soldiers' lives is not the way to achieve that goal...and that is the approach the republicans have taken.

furthermore, 9/11 is by far the only issue that's important to the american populace. it hasn't been the only issue since those first few days after the attack, when all that was on anyone's mind was wondering what had happened, who was responsible, and how to prevent it from happening again. that last consideration, preventing further attacks, is still an issue. but, so is education. so is health care. so are a million other things that voters should not be distracted away from by the mere invocation of 9/11.

this isn't intended as a diatribe against voting republican. this is intended as a diatribe against using 9/11 as a single issue or a pervasive theme in a campaign. i'm against single-issue campaigns as a rule, since governing a nation requires knowledge of the multitude of issues, and for the participants in government to have well-reasoned positions on the whole gamut of issues. using such an emotional, hot-button issue as a distraction tactic insults what i can only hope is the intelligence of most people, and belittles the rest of the spectrum of issues.

May 2013

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122 232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 31st, 2025 04:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios