![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
i'm reading a case, Broussard v. Huffman Manufacturing Company, 438 N.E.2d 1217 (Ill.App. 3rd 1982).
the defendant company makes gas cans. want to take a wild guess at the trade name under which the defendant assembles and distributes the gas cans?
Huffy.
aren't you...not supposed to huff gas? sheesh, i'm surprised that no silly goose decided to sue the company based on the idea that Huffy Gas Cans would encourage dumb kids to huff gas!
(okay, so i'm the only one who finds this absolutely hysterical? fine. banish me to the corner...but first, say the phrase "Huffy Gas Cans" five times to yourself and see if you don't crack up.)
the defendant company makes gas cans. want to take a wild guess at the trade name under which the defendant assembles and distributes the gas cans?
Huffy.
aren't you...not supposed to huff gas? sheesh, i'm surprised that no silly goose decided to sue the company based on the idea that Huffy Gas Cans would encourage dumb kids to huff gas!
(okay, so i'm the only one who finds this absolutely hysterical? fine. banish me to the corner...but first, say the phrase "Huffy Gas Cans" five times to yourself and see if you don't crack up.)
