ext_342850 ([identity profile] amazinggrace.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] faceless_wonder 2006-04-17 03:37 pm (UTC)

I completely agree with you regarding the whole vulnerability thing. However, I think a lot of what used to be defined as chivalry is more of, say, gender-neutral common courtesy. I don't get offended if a guy opens a door for me or offers me his jacket or his chair. I don't particularly care for struggling with a door (esp. if I'm carrying a lot of stuff, being cold, or standing up when I'd rather sit down. Of course, if a guy opens a door for me and then proceeds to grab my ass and say "YOU WEAK, VULNERABLE WOMAN", well, then that's a whole other story.

That said, I tend to open doors for people (male and female) rather than let the door slam in their faces. If I'm wearing a jacket that appears to be reasonably unisex, and a guy complains about being cold, I'll offer it to him. (Or even if I'm with a female friend who complains about being cold - of course the unisex thing doesn't apply there.) I'll get up and offer my seat on a bus to an old person or someone with a little kid or crutches or whatever. I guess I'm of the opinion that if we make typically chivalrous gestures more gender-neutral, then the whole insidious vulnerability issue is more or less negated.

That was really long. Sorry to clog up your comments page.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org